Introduction (911.1 to 911.2)
911.1
Firms are required to comply with the fundamental principles, be independent and apply the conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats to independence.
911.2
A loan or a guarantee of a loan with an assurance client might create a self-interest threat. This section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.
Requirements and Application Material
General
(911.3 A1)
911.3 A1
This section contains references to the "materiality" of a loan or guarantee. In determining whether such a loan or guarantee is material to an individual, the combined net worth of the individual and the individual's immediate family members may be taken into account.
Loans and Guarantees with an Assurance Client (R911.4)
R911.4
A firm, an assurance team member, or any of that individual's immediate family shall not make or guarantee a loan to an assurance client unless the loan or guarantee is immaterial to both:
Loans and Guarantees with an Assurance Client that is a Bank or Similar Institution (R911.5 to R911.6)
R911.5
A firm, an assurance team member, or any of that individual's immediate family shall not accept a loan, or a guarantee of a loan, from an assurance client that is a bank or a similar institution unless the loan or guarantee is made under normal lending procedures, terms and conditions.
911.5 A1
Examples of loans include mortgages, bank overdrafts, car loans and credit card balances.
911.5 A2
Even if a firm receives a loan from an assurance client that is a bank or similar institution under normal lending procedures, terms and conditions, the loan might create a self-interest threat if it is material to the assurance client or firm receiving the loan.
911.5 A3
An example of an action that might be a safeguard to address such a self-interest threat is having the work reviewed by an appropriate reviewer, who is not an assurance team member, from a network firm that is not a beneficiary of the loan.
Deposit or Brokerage Accounts
R911.6
A firm, an assurance team member, or any of that individual's immediate family shall not have deposits or a brokerage account with an assurance client that is a bank, broker, or similar institution, unless the deposit or account is held under normal commercial terms.
Loans and Guarantees with an Assurance Client that is not a Bank or Similar Institution (R911.7)
R911.7
A firm or an assurance team member, or any of that individual's immediate family, shall not accept a loan from, or have a borrowing guaranteed by, an assurance client that is not a bank or similar institution, unless the loan or guarantee is immaterial to both:
Building Blocks Approach
Complying with Part 4B requires knowing, understanding and applying:
- Part 1 - The fundamental principles and the conceptual framework
- Part 2 – Part 2 is also applicable to individual professional accountants in public practice (PAPPs) when performing professional activities pursuant to their relationship with the firm
- Part 3 - All of the relevant provisions set out in a particular section (Each 3xx section is also linked to 300)
- Part 4B – All the relevant provisions set out in a particular section.
The IESBA has applied a building blocks approach in establishing the structure of the Code. The conceptual framework set out in Part 1, Section 120, applies to all professional accountants (PAs) and is not repeated in subsequent Parts or sections but is expected to be applied by all PAs in the conduct of professional activities.
As an illustration of the building blocks approach:
- In all situations, paragraphs 120.8 A1 to 120.8 A2 of the conceptual framework identify conditions, policies and procedures that might be “factors relevant to evaluating the level of threats.”
- Incremental application material for evaluating threats is provided for PAPPs in paragraphs 300.7 A1 to 300.7 A2.
- Incremental context-specific factors are then included in each section and in each Part of the Code to emphasize the factors that are relevant to evaluating the level of the threat created by the specific circumstance.
Building Blocks Approach
Complying with Part 4B requires knowing, understanding and applying:
- Part 1 - The fundamental principles and the conceptual framework
- Part 2 – Part 2 is also applicable to individual professional accountants in public practice (PAPPs) when performing professional activities pursuant to their relationship with the firm
- Part 3 - All of the relevant provisions set out in a particular section (Each 3xx section is also linked to 300)
- Part 4B – All the relevant provisions set out in a particular section.
The IESBA has applied a building blocks approach in establishing the structure of the Code. The conceptual framework set out in Part 1, Section 120, applies to all professional accountants (PAs) and is not repeated in subsequent Parts or sections but is expected to be applied by all PAs in the conduct of professional activities.
As an illustration of the building blocks approach:
- In all situations, paragraphs 120.8 A1 to 120.8 A2 of the conceptual framework identify conditions, policies and procedures that might be “factors relevant to evaluating the level of threats.”
- Incremental application material for evaluating threats is provided for PAPPs in paragraphs 300.7 A1 to 300.7 A2.
- Incremental context-specific factors are then included in each section and in each Part of the Code to emphasize the factors that are relevant to evaluating the level of the threat created by the specific circumstance.
The eCode working group and the IESBA thank you for taking the time to beta test the eCode. We value your feedback which will be considered in finalising the eCode prior to its initial launch in June 2019 or in later phases of the product.
We ask that you use the eCode to navigate the Code using real life examples that you encounter in your role. For example:
- Accepting a new client or service - how would you use the eCode? What sections are you looking at, and was it clear there is related content?
- Consider an example where you are considering whether there has been a breach of the Code.
- You are explaining the key features of the revised and restructured Code.
Try various approaches e.g., search/advanced search/menu.
To send your feedback please click here.
Non-Authoritative Guidance
Building Blocks
Share